Category: Articles


This Isn’t a Post

I woke up this morning thinking...there's some sort of sporting contest on today. Indy race? Horse race? The Masters?

Oh yeah. That.

I think I should just watch a tape of last year's. I'd know how it ends, but that would be a good thing.

Meanwhile, a significant number of TOP readers (roughly 40%) aren't from here. If yer furrin and curious as to why this is a big day for those strange Murkins*, this year you can watch the Super Bowl online. Just thought I'd mention it.

Kickoff is 6:30 USA Eastern Time, give or take. (Indiana, where I was born, is weird when it comes to time. Apparently, different communities decide what time zone they want to be in. Indianapolis is in the Eastern time zone, but there are patches of the State in both the northwest and southwest that are in the Central zone. Every few years they make noises about integrating the entire State in one time zone, but nothing ever comes of it.)

This isn't a TOP post, by the way, so please pretend it isn't here. We've been getting some blowback recently for having too many off-topic posts, and we're determined to renew our vows with our first love in the weeks to come. Speaking of which, don't you think it's about time for Round Two of the Reader Print Offer contest? (Note: Do not submit yet!!)

The standard line with the Super Bowl is that the hype is everything and the game itself is a letdown, but the last time these two teams met, the underdog Giants spoiled the Patriots' perfect season and experts agree it was one of the best Super Bowls ever played. That's why they're calling this one "The Rematch." Fans actually have hopes of a decent game to watch along with all the commercials.

In the Consolation Prize Dept. for Yr. Hmbl. Ed. and the rest of us cheeseheads from 'Sconsin, Aaron Rodgers walked away with the NFL Most Valuable Player Award last night. He was graceful and modest except for another dig at the 49ers (he's still resentful that they drafted Alex Smith instead of him).

And if you're wondering, the switchover to Lion these past few days went...okay. It was my worst-ever experience with an Apple upgrade, but that's still not very bad. (I still can't get Exposé to work, though.) The switchover to the Airport didn't go so well, but that's on me. Did you know that one reason I got into photography was that I knew I wasn't good with computers? True story. You know what they say: "Oh well."

Enjoy the game, wherever you are. There won't be any posts here today, but we'll be back tomorrow.

Mike

*People who live in Murka.

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Bon Bons

Although they're different for each of us, I would guess that everybody has those dreaded "photographers you're supposed to like." You know, famous photographers whom everybody admires but who for some reason just don't grab you. I can think of a few who are that way for me. No names, now—let's be polite: there's no point in slagging off someone by name whose work someone else might love.

But then we have the opposite: guilty pleasures. Stuff you just lap up happily whenever you come across it and that just hits the spot for you.

I visited a bookstore far from home the other day and came across a new book that I just had to peruse, even though I ought to have been in browsing mode. The book has a lot of problems. It's called A Year in Photography: Magnum Archive.

A year? I assumed that meant they were surveying the best photography of a certain year. Which year? It doesn't say on the cover. Which bugged me. So I picked it up. And the first photograph I flipped to was dated 1978.

And the second one, 1954.

What the hell?

It actually took the small brain a while to figure out the concept the publishers were going for. The clue: there are 365 pictures in the book. Yeah—really—it's one of those calendar books, like the ones that give you an inspiring hokey fortune-cookie quotation to help you face every new morning, or a different cat cartoon to start each day off with a smile. (Who buys crap like that? Whoops, I said no slagging off.) Each picture is associated with a day of the year.

Pointless. It's just an excuse for publishing a stack of pictures.

Magnum, as in Champagne
But ahhh, what pictures. Magnum is the photographer's photo agency, started by photographers, for photographers. And named for the famous jumbo size of Champagne bottle. Yes, it was (and is) intended to make money, but its members had (and have) unprecedented freedom to follow their own stories and shoot the kinds of pictures they like, in the style that comes most naturally to them. Here, in somewhat plainspoken semi-matte one-picture-per-page reproduction that democratizes each picture relative to the others (and that I like quite a bit), are 365 great Magnum photographs. Many great masterpieces you will recognize, but many very fine pictures you will not. Verticals are not shortchanged, because the book is square; and there's not a single picture disfigured by being spilled across the gutter (good thing, too, because in a book this thick the gutter gets pretty prominent).

Magnumyear
Oops splat! Three stars out of five. But the shortcomings are
the publisher's, not the fault of the pictures.

And here we come to the second conceptual shortcoming. Books of Magnum "greatest hits" really don't make a lot of sense, because one of the stated principles of Magnum from the beginning was to allow the photographers control of the context in which the pictures were presented; no more slash-and-burn by editors willing to cut out the visual heart of a picture story or disorder its flow, no more cropping ruthlessly and crippling a composition to fit a layout or a page. Not that Magnum was ever really able to insist on such lofty objectives consistently. But still...here we get pictures pulled completely out of their original contexts, presented without story or background. I happen to know the stories behind a lot of these pictures, and they're important. They amplify the meaning and the impact of the photographs. But they're just not here. It's not just that this isn't the best way to see photographs...it's that it's specifically contrary to the spirit of Magnum. You don't even get simple captions except in the back of the book.

So...these are just pictures. One after the other, without emphasis, with no context or rhyme or reason.

So the book shouldn't even be recommendable, let alone so entrancingly pleasing. Because, really, this is a fair sampling of simply the best that the medium of photography has to offer. Bon bons they may be, plucked thus out of context and divorced from explication. But if you simply like looking at photographs (which I very much do), then this book actually is what all such books claim or pretend to be: a treasury. I literally had to sit down and take three quarters of an hour to slowly look at every page.

"So okay," as David Vestal is wont to say: not recommended.

...And yet recommended, as a guilty pleasure, if your guilty pleasures bear any resemblance to mine.

Mike

P.S. This title goes into much the same category as Photographers A–Z or Photo:Box (the links are to our reviews)—educational rather than original—albeit with the above caveats about the absence of commentary.

P.S. Here's the U.K. link , and the one from The Book Depository. The U.S. link is above, in the third paragraph.

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Comment by Roger Overall: "I'm currently working my way through this book. Every day, I study that day's photograph to see what I can learn from it. If the photographer is unknown to me, I research them. Gradually, in 15-minute blocks at bedtime, my knowledge of photography is growing.

"You've highlighted one of the things I dislike about the book. The photographs are presented without context. I think that diminishes them. In some cases, I struggle to see any merit in them at all. Sacrilege, I know, but a good few of the selected photographs are empty of story or artistic intent. As a book that makes forces you to learn by using your own initiative to find out more about the photographs and their creators, it works. It stimulates. As a standalone work that encapsulates all the reader needs between its covers, it fails."

Featured Comment by Stefan: "Speaking about Magnum photographs, I have been spending the last few evenings reading through Magnum Contact Sheets. Absolutely magnificent and surely a fitting complement to A Year in Photography: Magnum Archive.

TOP Down (Briefly)

TOP will be down for maintenance for a few days. However we will be back AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! As early as Saturday, but at least by Monday.

—Mike, TOP Chief Custodian and Facilities Maintenance Engineer

OT: The Art of Tea (for Two)…Pu Erhs

By Ctein

When I first wrote about the art of tea, I mentioned pu erhs, and several people asked me what they were.

It's no wonder. Pu erh teas have only been freely available in the U.S. for a score of years, and so are little-known and even less understood. Some of them have a unique flavor most commonly (and accurately) translated as "dirt," but describing all pu erhs that way would be no more accurate than describing all cheeses as being cheddary. The variety of flavors available in pu erhs makes them perhaps the most diverse of the groups of teas.

A new pu erh may be drinkable, but it is as likely to be bitter or astringent. Pu erh teas, though, are not merely dead dried leaves; they are chemically and biologically active. Pu erhs are supposed to age. Think cheeses and wines. The leaves continue to undergo oxidative and enzymatic changes, and they harbor microflora that further digest and ferment them. Pu erhs are eminently drinkable within a few years, but it can take anywhere from 10 years to 60 years for them to become truly brilliant. And, just as with cheeses and wines, many of them become totally forgettable.

Pu erhs come in four major types. Each type has its own broad flavor characteristics. Uncooked is traditional. The leaves are packed together, either loosely or compacted into bricks and bings (discs), where they start to age. Over the long run, uncooked pu erhs are more likely to produce the most spectacular teas.

Cooked pu erh is either gently heated or allowed to heat more from fermentation. This greatly accelerates the aging process producing a mature beverage much more quickly, but also denatures some of the chemical/biological components, so a cooked pu erh ages much less later. Like the uncooked versions, it can be aged as loose-leaf or compacted.

When it comes to brewing, pu erhs are practically bulletproof and thrive on vigorous brewing. They are one of the few teas where the universal recommendation is to start with boiling water. Brewing times range from 1 to 5 min., typically, but it's pretty much impossible to overbrew these teas. A half hour steep may produce a brew stronger than one would like (and so need a bit of dilution), but it will be flavorful, not bitter.

Pu erhs are designed for multiple infusions. I had one very nice pu erh that was only good for three brewings and I felt kind of, well, cheated. Another one was still doing well on the eighth pot. The flavor can change with each successive brew. A pu erh may be intensely dirty and smoky on the first pour and by the fifth be so grassy and fragrant that you'd think it was a floral tea. I can have one pu erh pot that I'm drinking from for the entire day, and it's like I'm drinking a whole bunch of different kinds of tea.

This unique characteristic, combined with the wide variety of flavors that pu erhs have to begin with, makes it pretty much impossible to characterize them as a group.

The ongoing aging process that makes pu erhs so fascinating is responsible for my comment last time that they are simultaneously some of the best bargains you can buy and an easy way to go bankrupt. For proper aging, the leaves are kept slightly warm (room temperature or a bit above), definitely dry, away from light, and open to air, because many of the reactions are aerobic ones. Paper's a common wrap. If you find a bing that is sealed in airtight plastic it's likely to be very cheap and of low quality.

Blog224figure1Do not judge a bing by its cover. These are all very cheap pu erhs, colorful boxes notwithstanding. Entirely drinkable, entirely uninspiring. But with time, who knows?

Low grade but entirely drinkable bings in the 12 ounce range are available for prices between $5 and $15 in many Chinese markets. At that price, one can afford to experiment. Jon Singer picked up a very cheap bing in a market a dozen years back. Some of it was put aside and forgotten until about a year ago. When brewed up, it was so complicated and subtle that Jon and I couldn't describe it. We could pick out a slightly lemony flavor note, but it was like trying to pick one single instrument out of a large orchestra. It was as far from smoky and dirty as you could imagine.

Jon sent me a couple of these very cheap bings. They are drinkable, if uninspiring, and I've put one of them in the back of the cupboard to see what it is like in another decade or so. It'll probably be lousy, but what the heck, it was $6.

Blog224figure2Three excellent and promising pu erhs. The two on the left came from Cha Guan and are no longer available, while the small bing on the right is one I just acquired from TeaSource.

Excellent bings and bricks go for $30–$60 when relatively young; my absolute favorite pu erh is a 500 gram brick that cost me $40 (that's enough for the better part of a year's worth of steady tea drinking). Daniel at Cha Guan (see my earlier tea post) was so proud of this find that he made it his shop's signature tea until it ran out. It's so smoky on the first pour it's like drinking a campfire, and it changes wonderfully with successive infusions. I was suffficiently impressed that I ordered a second brick and that is in the back of a cupboard. I'll see what happens to it in another decade. Truth is, I'm only a third of the way through the first brick after a year and a half.

Here's where financial madness can set in. You can acquire huge numbers of bings at individually reasonable prices. Before you know it, you have a substantial fortune tied up in dried camellia leaves (with the risk of finding down the line that you have the caffeinated equivalent of vinegar.) Happily, I do not have the collector allele in my genome. Still, one is tempted, especially when someone like Roy Fong comes back with a taster's set of eight bings, designed to appeal to a variety of palates and situations and which he has even greater hopes for when aged. A mere $350. I resisted. But I thought about it.

You don't want to know what will happen to the prices of some of these when they are fully aged, if they turn out to be as good as hoped. Really, you don't. Small amounts of the very best aged pu erhs sell for princely sums. I've never tried them; I never expect to. Fortunately, I am entirely happy with my modestly priced, delicious brews.

Ctein

Sometimes, Ctein's off-topic columns on TOP grow on you, and get better with age. If you don't like them now, set them aside for a little while. Who knows what might happen?

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Comment by Mano: "Here in China (hello from China), puer tea is widely considered to be top dog, though a few years ago there was a scandal that this prized symbol of Chinese culture was actually being produced in Africa and sold in the country with fraudulent credentials. Back then you could spend the typical worker's entire year salary on a quarter kilo brick of the tea; after the African issues and other problems with hoarders and speculators the price of the tea dropped like a rock. Now anyone can get a decent aged tea for an affordable price, and it has become very common. In fact I may have a few bricks of it sitting in the back of some cupboard in my kitchen. People like to give it to each other as gifts, which get given again to other people because no one can drink all of it."

Featured Comment by Fabian: "I will check back in a decade or so, to see if I hate this article by then. Today, though, I found it to be a very interesting and inspiring read. 'Drinking a campfire' certainly sounds like something worth testing! Thanks, Ctein!"

Featured Comment by Bob Rosinsky: "I never did get the 'tea' thing. My grandfather used to drink Lipton Tea. He'd plop the tea bag into a cup and add a couple of little saccharine tablets to it to sweeten it up. He was an odd man."

Featured Comment by Jerry Lewis-Evans: "Pu erh, or a phrase sounding phonetically similar, was a phrase that cropped up on various live Frank Zappa albums. It seemed to be one of those band 'in' jokes, but being from England I always took it to be a phrase that you would say while holding your nose to indicate an unpleasant smell! Maybe he was just indicating that it was time for a tea break!"

U.K. Deal on Lightroom 3

Lightroombox

Adobe Lightroom 3 is being offered at at Amazon U.K. for 1/3 off the usual price for a limited time. The price of £95 has been extended, and is good through March 2nd.

At current rates of exchange, this just about matches exactly the current U.S. price. (Seems it usually goes at a premium in the U.K.)

Mike
(Thanks to Gavin McLelland)

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Blog Note

Had some trouble today. There were two camera posts published that both had problems. The first pointed to a site (with Fuji XPro-1 samples) that we were told contained a trojan. Sincere apologies if anyone was adversely affected by this.

The second post contained factual errors, for which I take responsibility.

Both posts have been removed. I apologize for the inconvenience. We'll return with more content tomorrow, I hope better edited and executed.

Mike

UPDATE: I don't know anything about the supposedly infected site, or even whether it's actually infected. I got messages from two readers who both said it had set off their anti-viral safeguards, so I opted to take down the link. It might be nothing. I just don't know. Sorry I can't tell you anything more.

Random Excellence: Colin Steel (Nikon V1)

SteelmyanmarPhoto by Colin Steel. Notice the young monk on the far left?

I was talking to my friend Kevin Kallenbach the other day—Kevin's a sales associate at my local camera store, Mike Crivello's Camera Center in Brookfield—and he was saying he thinks it's kind of too bad that enthusiasts on the web are trending thumbs-down on the Nikon V1 in comparison to other mirrorless options. He thinks it's a very worthy camera for those it's aimed at—anyone stepping up from a digicam (i.e., a digital point-and-shoot). Small and handy, quick and responsive, simple to use, and a big step up in image quality from a phone or digicam.

As if to drive home the point that it's good even for more serious photographers, Scottish travel photographer Colin Steel took a chance recently and decided to leave his big cameras at home (home being Singapore for Colin) and take only a minimalist setup on a journey to Bagan, Yangon, Mandalay, and Inle Lake in Myanmar.

SteelV1TravelKit

He took only a Nikon V1 two-lens kit with the 10–30mm VR and 30–110mm VR, a Manfrotto Pocket camera support, and a Manfrotto ML120 Pocket-12 LED light.

This picture above is of the reclining Buddha at the Htilominlo pagoda complex on the road between Nyaung U and Bagan. Colin says of Bagan:

...It just happens to be my favorite photography destination in Asia. Myanmar is still relatively unspoiled and Bagan is a wondrous location with a fantastic diversity of pagodas, temples, markets, working river and everyday life. There are over a thousand temples and pagodas left in Bagan, which is one of the ancient capitals of Myanmar; the rest were destroyed by natural disasters, earthquakes and the like.

The two-lens V1 kit gave him both wide angle and a fairly long telephoto; Colin adds that "the stabilization on these lenses is phenomenal and I lost very few shots to shake or blur."

More about this trip (and his other jaunts) can be found on Colin's travel blog. There are three posts in the Myanmar Minimalist series—the original post, Part 2, and Part 3, which has the most pictures.

Mike
(Thanks to Colin Steel)

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Improving Your Sensors

I went to have my vision tested yesterday, which for one reason and another ended up monopolizing most of the day. Some vocabulary for your edification, if for some reason you are as ignorant as I was yesterday:

Optician: Technican who makes (or sometimes just sells) lenses and eyeglasses.

Optometrist: Licensed medical professional trained to prescribe and fit lenses to improve vision and to diagnose and treat various eye diseases.

Ophthalmologist: Specialist in medical and surgical eye problems. Also, hardest medical specialty to remember how to correctly spell. (I vote we improve matters by getting rid of that first aitch. That first ell could go too. Opthamologist: There, isn't that better?)

I've actually known this in the past, but my ignorance on the matter seems to be self-renewing.

At any rate, I saw an optometrist yesterday. I have a problem in my right eye which so far no one has been able to diagnose; it's 20/60 and not particularly susceptible to correction. My left eye is age-appropriate, about 20/40 and very correctable. I'm learning how to use viewfinders left-eyed.

Superman clark kent
Unlike Clark Kent, glasses improve my super powers.

I got fitted for a pair of glasses specifically corrected for 22–24 inches, the distance my computer screen is from my eyes. I did this not for my eyes but for my neck, which has been hurting: the problem is that on sites where the text is not easily resized, I lean in and squint at the screen, hunching as I do so. I'm hoping my new glasses will relieve eyestrain at the computer and help me relax. They should also be good for looking at work in galleries and museums. (Maybe I'll get a pair of bifocals corrected for eight feet on top and two feet on the bottom and call them "museum glasses.")

I suppose everyone in the world but me takes perfect care of themselves, visiting their physician twice a year, their dentist three times, and their optometrist once. But just in case you haven't seen your optometrist in a few years, I urge you to make an appointment. Keep those sensors in good shape! And that prescription up to date.

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

First Fuji X-Pro1 Images Hit the Web

CoyneVery small detail of a much larger portrait shot by Michael Coyne with the new Fuji X-Pro1 at ISO 1000. Early trials don't contradict the notion that X-Pro1 image quality will be state of the art.

AIPP Australian and Western Australian Landscape Photographer of the Year 2011 Christian Fletcher and his friend Michael Coyne have gotten their hands on a Fuji X-Pro1 and have put some initial images and a short teaser video up on the web. (The server is probably really busy so be patient or check back later.) Fuji has really smacked down the gauntlet with this camera, saying that it will either surpass or rival (depending on what you read) the image quality of pedal-to-the-metal full-frame professional DSLRs.

Christian has invited people to download the images and play with them on their own computers.

And speaking of the X-Pro1, was I ever wrong about "the world's most desirable camera." At least at the moment, the X-Pro1 has put the Sony NEX-7 in the shade. Of course, wait till next month. (Same as it ever was.)

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Comment by Mark Olwick: "There are many more sample images out there. The best are here and here. More here."

Mike replies: Those don't seem large enough to tell me much of anything (and large versions at the French site won't open for me). But thanks....

Open Mike: Coffee ‘n’ the Car

Coffee
I won't be writing a lot more on coffee, and there's a reason for that.

I've raised my game considerably when it comes to my morning cup: I'm now roasting all my own coffee; I got myself a good burr grinder (the #1 most important purchase if you want good coffee), and I've put together a small "personal library" about coffee and learned an awful lot about it. As with most subjects, it's much more extensive than meets the eye, and much more fascinating than you'd think, once you get into it.

Aye, but here's the rub: I can't be a coffee connoisseur. Why? A very good reason: I can't smell. (I was going to say "I don't smell good," but hey, I shower.) That is, I don't have a good sense of smell.

They say that dogs' sense of smell is ten to 100 times as good as ours, but that they can't taste very well at all. Food is all in the nose for them. It's long been known, anecdotally and scientifically, that for humans, too, the most exquisite and sophisticated appreciation of flavors is a confabulation of taste and smell. Well, I've become convinced that half of the appreciation of coffee, if not more, is in the nose as well. And I just have a very poor sense of smell.

That isn't just the way I was born: I had chronic sinus infections for years, acquired a dependency on nasal spray for a time, and finally had to have an operation on my sinuses in 1988. I've probably had 80 to 100 sinus infections in my life, and used to have to get my sinuses flushed regularly. (Stop me if this is too much information). I breathe clearly, now, finally, but can't smell worth a damn.

The bottom line with coffee is, I can't appreciate the nuances. I like the good stuff, and I can tell the difference between what I like and what I don't, but I'm convinced I'm not getting the whole picture. So I figure I'm just not suited to be a coffee connoisseur. That fits with what I've long known about myself: I like good coffee, but I don't really mind bad coffee all that much. It has to be really bad before I can't drink it.

However, I have discovered that roasting your own is very easy—almost too easy. The roaster I bought is easy to learn and simple to use, although it takes up a significant amount of room and you need a Shop-Vac to clean up with. It's only as big as a large toaster oven or small microwave, but it needs clear space around it when you use it. Cleanup takes 30 seconds if you do it slowly, so don't be put off by that. They say it can be expected to last for 2–3 years of regular use, but green coffee beans cost 1/2 to 2/3 what roasted coffee costs, so I figure, for me, the roaster will pay for itself 1 1/2 to 2 times over before it goes to the big roastery in the sky. If you drink a lot of coffee and have the space, the money savings alone could be reason enough to learn to roast.

And even I can smell the aroma of roasting coffee.

The car
I'm frankly astonished by the Subaru-Toyota sports car that's just been introduced (and that I've been writing about). See if you follow: Subaru's version is called the BRZ, which, among other things, is Serbian for "quick"—or so I've heard; Toyota's version is called the FT-86, but will be sold as the Scion FR-S in North America, Scion being Toyota's budget brand targeted at young people. The two companies' cars are mechanically the same, but have different styling, tires, and options lists, and, more importantly, different suspension setups. Toyota did the styling and contributed some engine technology, but Subaru did the engineering and is building all of them.

Why astonished? Despite being talked about since almost forever, this thing comes completely out of left field. To begin with, it's small, and it's light, at least by today's standards—Ron Kiino in this month's Motor Trend calls it a "Miata coupe," and he's not far off, except that you can't get 200 hp and 150 pound-feet of torque from any known unblown Miata engine. And Mazda no longer sells a blown Miata. Yes, the Subaru-Toyota has a stick shift and the all-important rear-wheel drive, which are getting uncommon, and the engine's just a four-banger, albeit a boxer like in a Porsche. I love four-cylinder engines. Give me one any day, as long as the car it's in suits it.

BrzintAll business: the BRZ from the helm. Photo courtesy Motor Trend.

Made by Subaru, you did get that? Subaru, which virtually forged its identity on full-time all-wheel-drive cars long before they were so common (remember when AWD vehicles were called "4x4s" and you had to switch manually into four wheel drive whenever you needed it?) And it significantly bucks some some very pervasive trends: the engine (at least for now, as introduced—the enthusiast base is already salivating for the inevitable STI version) is naturally aspirated, when everybody and his uncle is building turbos and putting them in everything (have you heard the one about the Turbo Chevy Sonic? It's true, and is reportedly a great improvement). It's dedicated to handling, in this day of horsepower über alles, when luxury carmakers will drop in engines that are too big even to the detriment of handling. (Mercedes AMG, I am talkin' 'bout you.)

No CVT, no turbo- or supercharger, no cylinder management, no AWD, no keep-up-with-the-Joneses horsepower for guys who are afraid their masculinity will be threatened if they don't cart around a whacking big thirsty engine they never need.

Yeah, it will have sat-nav available and a nanny or two. But it's not loaded down with a bunch of features. For the most part it's just basic, pure, old-fashioned sports car.

If you've been reading me on cameras for any length of time, you know what a breath of fresh air this is to me. I mean, BMW should really be ashamed of itself for not abandoning that old tagline "The ultimate driving machine." (Although it does seem to be gradually replacing it with "Sheer driving pleasure," which is more accurate.) Did you know that there's actually a BWM that has a cabin so well insulated from sound that buyers complain they can't hear the V8 well enough—so BMW actually pipes fake V8 engine noise into the passenger cabin through the stereo system when the car is switched to "sport mode"? I am not making this up. They're nice luxury cars, and I'm not slagging you if you own one, but, really, the days of the "ultimate driving machine" are completely over and gone even at BMW. Everything's market driven and the market is focused on "luxury" to a fault or "economy" in the breach.

And now here comes a pure driving machine, a Miata coupe with the engine Mazda won't give us. And it's been engineered from the ground up. All new. Any idea how uncommon that is, in this day and age? You can count the number of clean-slate cars on your fingers and toes, and if you lop off the one-percenter end of the market you won't need your toes.

It's like a camera coming along that had a 6-MP full-frame sensor, no viewing screen, no JPEG engine, buttons and knobs assignable by loading in third-party apps, and that had a viewfinder like an OM-4T*. And that was made of metal with leather gripping surfaces. The whole photography world would do double-takes. No, triple-takes. We'd all be shaking our heads and wondering, from what alternative universe did that thing come? 

That's the BRZ. I can't wait to drive it. This, you will probably hear about from me again.

Mike

"Open Mike" is your host going off-topic and astray. Sundays only.

P.S. Here's my coffee library:

Home Coffee Roasting: Romance and Revival by Kenneth Davids. The basics of home roasting. Contains most of the information found in his more basic Guide to Buying, Brewing, and Enjoying.
Everything But Espresso: Professional Coffee Brewing Techniques by Scott Rao. The science behind brewing the perfect cup (essential). There's a companion volume for espresso if that's your interest.
The World of Caffeine: The Science and Culture of the World's Most Popular Drug by Bennett Alan Weinberg and Bonnie K. Bealer. (You might have to buy this one used!)
Uncommon Grounds: The History of Coffee and How It Transformed Our World by Mark Pendergrast. The history of coffee from its mythological origin-story to the advent of Starbucks; some overlap with the title above, but a different focus.
Javatrekker: Dispatches From the World of Fair Trade Coffee by Dean Cycon. On-the-ground view of direct trade and fair trade. Entertaining. Coffee is the world's second most valuable legal commodity, after oil, so the economics of it are important.

There's also a lot of information on the web, of course, although a lot of it is pretty far-flung.

*Don't say B&W-only, Mike. Don't say it. Don't say anything about a square sensor. These things will just make people crazy. Do not make people crazy.

Send this post to a friend

Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon

Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Comment by Karl: "To be honest, I'm not crazy about the body styling. After driving one it might well become beautiful, but as I see it now it looks a bit over- styled. The sculpture to it feels a little forced, a bit too much. The line is clean then broken. Just my opinion."

Mike replies: True, its looks are only so-so. But then, the major requirement in terms of appearance is to, let us say, keep the lack of appeal at bay, which they've more or less done. I mean, look at the parentage here: Subaru, whose WRX is one of the strangest of modern designs, to put it politely; and Toyota, whose previous sports car was the MR2. Considering that lineage, it's pretty amazing that the new baby isn't quite a bit...er, less attractive.

Featured Comment by Earl Dunbar: "Oh man, the new OM-D is going to be a sexy OM-4T with a big B&W sensor! Yaaaa hooo!!!"

Mike replies: I know nothing. Unfortunately, I mean that un-ironically.

Featured Comment by JH: "When I read that BMW was using this sound system to pipe in engine noise for the new M5, I collapsed in laughter. When I had a E46 M3 and was a BMW Club Instructor for track days, I cornered the M brand manager at a club gathering and gave him an earful about the car being so quiet. He calmly explained they could not make loud exhausts or engines because of the European laws regarding noise. So I suggested, jokingly, of course, the could at least put the noise through the sound system (which is networked with the engine management system). Oh my god, am I responsible for this travesty?"

Mike replies: Oh, so you're the guy!

Powered by Photography Blog | Copyright Photography-Blog.co.za